Legal Opinion
State v. Polsky
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1971No. 522PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of unlawfully selling a narcotic drug, to wit, heroin, in violation of § 54-7-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. 8, pt. 2, 1962). We affirm.
Defendant relies upon four stated points and numerous sub-points for reversal. We shall consider them in the order of their presentation in his brief in chief.
He argues his first two points together under two sub-points, or divisions, which he has entitled “Speedy Trial” and “Denial of Discovery.” His contention, in his brief in chief under “Speedy Trial,” is that he was denied his right to a speedy trial as…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RuffinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. CrumpNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. DyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.