Legal Opinion

State v. Hilbish

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1940No. 3288PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

The appellants were convicted of grand larceny and have appealed from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial. They will sometimes be referred to hereinafter by their names. The errors assigned are as follows:

“1. The court erred in failing to assign counsel to represent the defendants Bridges and Larkin, or to require said defendants to be entered of record as their own counsel.
“2. The court erred in granting the motion of the District Attorney for an order of dismissal of the information and all charges against the defendants, Bridges and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. VietsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. State v. StreeterNevada Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State v. SeymourNevada Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tungate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cutler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. LaPena v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Cheatham v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API