Legal Opinion

Tungate v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1958No. 29,523PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellant was charged jointly with two others by affidavit in two counts with the crimes of grand larceny under Acts 1941, ch. 148, §9, p. 447; being §10-8001, Burns’ 1956 Replacement, and second degree burglary under Acts 1941, ch. 148, §4, p. 447, being §10-701, Burns’ 1956 Replacement, tried separately by jury, found guilty as charged and sentenced on both charges, the sentences to run concurrently.

The sole error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Thirty-five specifications therefor are set out in the motion. All except numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 21…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pitts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hansen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Durke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bowen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Emerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Vacendak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API