Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1988No. 18261PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.:

Kenneth Loranzo Cheatham, Jean McKinnis, Clinton Long, and Melvin Howard were accused of robbing and murdering a drug dealer named Melvin Douglas Arritt in McKinnis’s hotel room at the Circus Circus Hotel and Casino in Reno, Nevada. McKinnis, Long and Howard all pleaded guilty to second degree murder. Cheatham proceeded to trial and was convicted by a jury of second degree murder.

Cheatham’s principal claims of error are the following: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay statements by McKinnis; (2) that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Austin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. CrippsMontana Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Runion v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Heglemeier v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Heglemeier v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Corey Ramon Davis v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Marengo Circuit Court: CC-09-102)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API