LaPena v. Sheriff, Clark County
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Zenoff, J.:
Appellant Frank LaPena was held to answer for the crime of second-degree kidnapping, NRS 200.310, and battery with use of a deadly weapon, NRS 200.481. He appeals the denial of his writ of habeas corpus contending insufficiency of evidence of corroboration of the accomplice testimony to justify holding him for trial. NRS 175.291. 1
LaPena is accused of hiring Gerald Weakland to kidnap and injure Willis Obenauer, manager of the Hacienda Hotel in Clark County, where LaPena worked as bell captain. Weak-land and one Robert Webb testified as State witnesses that they,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Kinsey v. Sheriff, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Austin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ChapmanNevada Supreme Court · 1871
- Goldsmith v. Sheriff of Lyon CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herb Hallman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Nash-HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Cutler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- LaPena v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Fish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BoueriNevada Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.