Legal Opinion

State v. Seymour

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1936No. 3133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, C. J.:

The defendant, Arthur B. Seymour, was convicted of the crime of incest. .He has' appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is alleged in the information that the offense was committed in the county of Washoe, State of Nevada, on or about October 1, 1934. The mother of the female with whom the defendant is alleged to have committed the crime instituted the prosecution, but for convenience we will refer to the daughter as the prosecutrix.

Defendant insists that the evidence in insufficient to justify the verdict, and that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  5. People v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. LaPena v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. HilbishNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Posey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. SENA (CHRISTOPHER) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API