Legal Opinion

Hockenberry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI 1, Judge.

Sonja Hockenberry (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the partial grant of her claim petition against the Pennsylvania State Police (Employer) and their insurance carrier, the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, under the Workers’ Compensation Act2 (Act).

Claimant was injured during the course of her employment as a file clerk on April 2, 1990, when, as she reached up to position a file some nine feet above the floor, her neck locked and she experienced significant pain. Claimant’s chiropractor, Guy R. Schenker, D.C.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Braun Baking Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Walk v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Duquesne Truck Service v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eidem v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Gnaden-Huetten Memorial Hospital)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Hoover v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Fontaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Eidem v. Workers Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API