Legal Opinion

Walk v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Carole Walk (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Ap*647peal Board. The board affirmed a referee’s decision to suspend benefits pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.

This matter commenced when U.S. Air, Inc. (employer) filed a petition for termination of claimant’s benefits, alleging that claimant had no residual or permanent disability as a result of her work injury or, alternatively, that work was available to claimant. Claimant subsequently denied the material allegations set forth in employer’s petition, and hearings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mrs. Smith's Frozen Foods Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. World Kitchen, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Capuano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hockenberry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Waratuke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API