Eidem v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
The sole issue before us is whether Gna-den-Huetten Memorial Hospital’s (hereafter employer) referral letter to Julianna Eidem (hereafter claimant) provided sufficient notice of an available job position to satisfy employer’s burden of proof pursuant to Kachinski v. WCAB (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240, 532 A.2d 374 (1987). For the reasons set forth herein, we determine that employer’s letter was sufficient to satisfy its burden of proof pursuant to Kachinski and reverse the Commonwealth Court.
Claimant worked at Gnaden-Huetten Memorial Hospital as a nurse’s aide.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Waugh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Braun Baking Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Carbaugh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.