20th Century Cigarette Vendors v. Shaheen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.
Defendant Vincent Shaheen appeals from a judgment in the sum of $5,500 entered against him and his codefendants Albert J. Shaheen and Balph E. Smith.
There is relatively little dispute concerning the factual background which gave rise to the alleged liability of defendant Vincent Shaheen:1 On June 7, 1960, three individuals, Bob Arrowood—who was named as a defendant but not served —Balph Smith and Albert borrowed $5,500 from plaintiffs on an unsecured promissory note payable in 18 monthly installments beginning September 1, 1960. In case of default plaintiffs had the option to accelerate the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wilson v. BittickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Garratt v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Pellegrini v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981