Wilson v. Bittick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
In this action for damages for the use and occupancy of a parcel of land plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Bittick and Frakes.1
This is but one more step in apparently interminable litigation begun some 13 years ago over the title to and rents or profits from a half section of unimproved farmland in Los Angeles County. The principal protagonists in this wordy drama are plaintiff and Burton A. Browne, each of whom claimed sole ownership of the disputed parcel; assuming the roles of innocent spectators are Bittick and Frakes, brothers-in-law who dry-farmed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Wozniak v. Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- G & D Holland Construction Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.