Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1927No. 6,032PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This is an action to quiet title. After setting forth the corporate existence of the various defendants, the complaint alleged plaintiff to be the owner and entitled to the possession of lots, 19 and 20 in block 116 of the city of Billings, that the defendants claimed some right, title, interest or estate therein, but that such claims were without any right, and concluded with the usual prayer that defendants be required to set forth the nature of their claims, and that it be adjudged and decreed that they were without right, and that the plaintiff was the owner of the premises involved, etc.

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Woare v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gow v. Cascade Silver Mines & Mills Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hansen v. GoodrichMontana Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Missoula Light & Water Co. v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Coburn v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API