Gow v. Cascade Silver Mines & Mills Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Wm. E. Carroll, Judge. Action by Paul A. Gow against the Cascade Silver Mines & Mills Co. and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. A special administrator has not any authority to vote estate stock for the purpose of increasing the capitalization of the corporation in which the estate owns stock. (Sees. 10107 and 10111, Eev.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Wm. E. Carroll, Judge. Action by Paul A. Gow against the Cascade Silver Mines & Mills Co. and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. A special administrator has not any authority to vote estate stock for the purpose of increasing the capitalization of the corporation in which the estate owns stock. (Sees. 10107 and 10111, Eev. Codes 1921; In re Williams’ Estate, 55 Mont. 67, 1 A. L. E. 1639, 173 Pac. 790.) The manifest intention of the legislature was to make the special administrator a conservator of the estate; to collect…
1Opinion of the Court
MR. COMMISSIONER BENNETT
prepared the opinion for the court.
Plaintiff and appellant commenced this action in the district court for Silver Bow county seeking to enjoin the defendants from doing certain acts contemplated by a resolution adopted at a meeting of the stockholders of the Cascade Silver Mines & Mills Co., a corporation. The corporation, its directors, and its secretary and treasurer, were made joint defendants and are the respondents. The action was instituted by a minority stockholder of the defendant corpora-, tion. It is based upon the contention that the action of the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re Williams' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- State ex rel. Bartlett v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- In re MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Congdon v. OldsMontana Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Missoula Light & Water Co. v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- Springhorn v. DirksMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Thompson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Davenport v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Bielenberg v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.