Legal Opinion

Coburn v. Coburn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. 6,736PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This action was instituted to foreclose a real estate mortgage executed by the defendant as security for the payment of his promissory note for the sum of $500, given to the plaintiff July 27, 1923, of even date with the mortgage. The complaint is in usual form. By way of answer the defendant, John W. Coburn, admitted the execution of the note and mortgage, but attempts to defend affirmatively by reason of a judgment entered by the district court of Cascade county April 4, 1924, upon the promissory note alone, said to estop the plaintiff in this action. The answer of the defendant Peter G.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State Savings Bank v. AlbertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ould v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Commercial Bank v. KershnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Haupt v. SimingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Delmoe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hanrahan v. AndersenMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Hofmann's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API