Legal Opinion

In re Scharf

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1946No. 5133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 9) in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a product comprising soybean lecithin (soybean phosphatide), in an amount not less than 20%, and a substance rich in vitamin B complex, and a process of making the same.

Claims 1 and 3 are sufficiently illústrative of the appealed claims. They read:

1. A product containing commercial soybean lecithin and a substance rich in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In re RosenblattCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  3. In re DichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. In re WoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of BoogeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API