Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Lee

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 18, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5815PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner who rejected claims 1, 2, 3, 42, 43, 86, and 87 of appellant’s application for a patent covering alleged new and useful improvements in a conveyer for loading coal, particularly from a mine room. Eight claims were allowed by the board.

The references are:

Jamison 1,128,880 Feb. 16, 1915

Joy 1,306,064 June 10, 1919

Burnell 1,449,088 Mar. 20, 1923

Cartlidge 1,997,247 Apr. 9, 1935

Arentzen 2,298,448 Oct. 13, 1942

Holstein 2,326,857 Aug. 17, 1943

Dobe…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Faulkner v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. International Standard Electric Corp. v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of O'KeefeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Application of CarterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. In re IrmscherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API