In re Wood
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Appellants have here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the examiner of claims 9, 12, 16, 17 and 18 of their application for a patent relating to the seating portion of a chair.
The claims are as follows:
9. A chair seat embodying therein a seat bottom, body engageable means supported upon said seat bottom and arranged to provide a channel in the seat bottomed by an associated part of the seat bottom in line therewith, said channel having parts one of which curves rearwardly and laterally from the front central…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re PrescottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hall v. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Application of LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re ScharfCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Application of FranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of Alois M. GemassmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.