Legal Opinion

Application of Booge

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims, 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellants’ application for a patent relating to “Titanium Oxide Pigment Production.”

The development in issue is the production of improved titanium dioxide pigments said to be characterized by optimum particle size, high hiding power, tinting strength, and advanced weathering durability. Titanium dioxide is an old and important commercial pigment, useful in its anatase and rutile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In re CremerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. In re YountCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. In re GilletteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API