Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Melton v. Sneed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 24, 1940No. 29170PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This case involves the question of the validity and effect of the following instrument:

“Know All Men by These Presents, That whereas, I, H. Melton, have this day employed Eddleman & Sneed a firm composed of A. Eddleman and R. R. Sneed, as my attorneys to represent me and take care of my interest in a certain case now pending in the District Court in Carter County, Oklahoma, same being numbered 5383, Wesley Lester and D. E. Booker, Plaintiffs vs. H. Melton, et al, Defendants, said action being a suit to recover
“The NV2 of SEy4 and Ey> of the SW14 of Section 26, Township 2 South, Range 3 West,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Miller v. RidgleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API