Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Woll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2012No. 20120269PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald Rowland appeals from a summary judgment declaring that 15 deeds executed in the 1950s covering certain Bowman County property conveyed royalty interests rather than mineral interests, and from an order denying his motion to vacate the judgment. Because the deeds are ambiguous and reasonable differences of opinion exist as to the inferences to be drawn about the grantor’s intent from the language of the deeds and the extrinsic evidence presented, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] On December 19, 1952, Finlay F. Hamilton…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers Union Oil Co. of Garrison v. SmetanaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Saltsman v. SharpNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Johnson v. Mineral Estate, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bohn v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. THR Minerals, LLC. v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API