Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1937No. 26664PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This case involves the construction of the following clause in a deed from J. S. Bowen and Drucie Bowen, his wife, to Gebrge E. McClelland, covering a farm in Garvin county: “As a part of the consideration, the parties of the first part herewith retain an undivided one-half (Vz) interest in and to the royalty (the ordinary Vs ordinarily left the grantor in oil and gas leases being the royalty above referred to) in the above land.” After the execution of this deed the Pauls Valley National Bank acquired title to said land at a foreclosure sale, and later conveyed by warranty deed the land to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Work v. United States Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Homestake Exploration Corp. v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Griffith v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clarion Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Duvall v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Melton v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API