Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDico

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2008No. 2007-2378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Steven L. LoDico of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0041715, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1989. On September 21, 2005, we suspended respondent from the practice of law for 18 months, with six months stayed on conditions, based on findings that he had engaged in unprofessional, undignified, and discourteous conduct in separate incidents before two common pleas court judges. Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDico, 106 Ohio St.3d 229, 2005-Ohio-4630, 833 N.E.2d 1235. On February 23, 2006, respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDicoOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. CantrellOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. TheislerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API