Legal Opinion
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Conrady
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 3, 2012No. SCBD 5735PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGurich, J.
1 1 On March 16, 2011, the Oklahoma Bar Association ("OBA") filed a complaint against attorney James Albert Conrady ("Conrady") for alleged professional misconduct, as authorized by Rule 6.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings ("RGDP").1 After hearing the testimony of witnesses, and being presented with several exhibits, the Pro*135fessional Responsibility Tribunal ("PRT") concluded that Conrady's actions were a violation of Rule 8.4(b) of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct ("ORPC").2 The PRT also found Conrady had violated RGDP Rule 1.3. The Report of the Trial Panel…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. MANSFIELDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel.OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZANNOTTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DRUMMONDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.