Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cantrell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2011No. 2011-0281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, Doreen M. Cantrell of Willoughby, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0040032, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline concluded that respondent engaged in professional misconduct and recommends that she be permanently disbarred from the practice of law, with costs of these proceedings taxed to her.

{¶ 2} We agree that respondent committed professional misconduct as found by the board; however, we reject the board’s recommended sanction and conclude that an indefinite suspension is the appropriate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LinnenOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GittingerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. UlinskiOhio Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Weir (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. PetersonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Cincinnati Bar Association v. DamonOhio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API