Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDico
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 2005No. 2004-2172PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Steven L. LoDico of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0041715, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1989. Since that time, his primary professional focus has been criminal defense in Ohio’s state courts.
{¶ 2} On March 16, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, charging respondent with two counts of professional misconduct, which respondent answered. The charges arise from a grievance filed by five judges of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, General Division. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re VincentiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In Re Lodico, Unpublished Decision (1-18-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BreinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. MarkovichOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDicoOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. VogelOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.