Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Conrady

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 2012No. SCBD 5735Published

1Opinion of the Court

275 P.3d 133 (2012)

2012 OK 29

STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

James Albert CONRADY, Respondent.

SCBD No. 5735.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 3, 2012.

Gina Hendryx, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant.

Rod W. Wiemer, Okmulgee, Oklahoma, for Respondent.

GURICH, J.

¶ 1 On March 16, 2011, the Oklahoma Bar Association ("OBA") filed a complaint against attorney James Albert Conrady ("Conrady") for alleged professional misconduct, as authorized by Rule 6.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings ("RGDP").[1] After hearing the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API