Legal Opinion
United States of America v. Daniel Klubock
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 30, 1987No. 86-1413PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION EN BANC
2Per curiam
In this challenge to a local rule adopted by the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the district court sustained the validity of the rule. United States v. Klubock, 639 F.Supp. 117 (D.Mass.1986). A divided panel of this court affirmed in an opinion dated March 25,1987. Upon granting the petition for rehearing en banc, this court, as is customary, vacated the panel’s judgment and withdrew the panel opinion. Upon en banc consideration, this court is divided 3-3. Therefore, the decision of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.
We reproduce below…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Colgrove v. BattinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Miner v. AtlassSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States of America v. Daniel KlubockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. KlubockDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
4Cited by55 opinions
- Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,389 Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid Corporation, Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Del Marcelle v. Brown County Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Donald K. Stern v. United States District Court for the District of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.