Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Heebe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1987No. 86-475PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question for decision is whether a United States District Court may require that applicants for general admission *643to its bar either reside or maintain an office in the State where that court sits.

I

Petitioner David Frazier is an attorney having both his residence and his law office in Pascagoula, Mississippi. An experienced litigator, he is a member of the Mississippi and Louisiana State Bars, and also of the Bars of the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. In April 1982, Frazier…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API