United States of America v. Daniel Klubock
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED PANEL OPINION
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question of first impression which directly implicates the rule-making powers of the district courts, and indirectly, rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution.1 The precise point before us is whether a district court can adopt a local rule which requires prosecutors to seek prior judicial approval before serving a grand jury subpoena upon an attorney, for the purpose of obtaining evidence about the attorney’s clients.
Background
In early 1986 the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (SJC), at the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Stephen Tornay, Galene Tornay v. United States of America A.R. Demeter, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- United States v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Jose Rivera v. M/t FossarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States of America v. Daniel KlubockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.