Legal Opinion

Colgrove v. Battin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 1973No. 71-1442PublishedCited by 257 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

Local Rule 13(d)(1) of the Revised Rules of Procedure of the United States District Court for the District of *150Montana provides that a jury for the trial of civil cases shall consist of six persons.1 When respondent District Court Judge set this diversity case for trial before a jury of six in compliance with the Rule, petitioner sought mandamus from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to direct respondent to impanel a 12-mem-ber jury. Petitioner contended that the local Rule (1) violated the Seventh Amendment;2 (2) violated the statutory provision, 28 U. S. C. § 2072, that rules “shall…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by257 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API