Colgrove v. Battin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Local Rule 13(d)(1) of the Revised Rules of Procedure of the United States District Court for the District of *150Montana provides that a jury for the trial of civil cases shall consist of six persons.1 When respondent District Court Judge set this diversity case for trial before a jury of six in compliance with the Rule, petitioner sought mandamus from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to direct respondent to impanel a 12-mem-ber jury. Petitioner contended that the local Rule (1) violated the Seventh Amendment;2 (2) violated the statutory provision, 28 U. S. C. § 2072, that rules “shall…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.