Legal Opinion

Jones v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided March 10, 1998No. GDTC-D-97-119PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCosgrove, J.

The defendant Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (hereinafter MTGA) filed a motion to dismiss the claim of the plaintiff Tanya Thomas Jones under the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority Discriminatory Employment Practices Claims and Appeals Ordinance, TGA 97-5. The MTGA claims that Ms. Jones lacks standing to file a Claim, that even if she did have standing she has not filed her claim to this court in a timely fashion and further that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies pursuant to TGA 97-5 and therefore any Appeal would be defective.

This court is a court of limited…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
  5. Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pineiro v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1999
  2. Pirolli v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1998
  3. Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Bethel v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1998
  5. Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API