Legal Opinion

Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 2005No. GDCA-T-04-502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON APPEAL

MANFREDI, J.

HISTORY OF CASE:

This appeal arises out of the dismissal oí the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by the Gaming Disputes Trial Court. The Plaintiff David Bartha is a member of The Mohegan Tribe, and the Plaintiff First American Mechanical, Inc. is a Certified Mohegan Entity as defined in The Mohegan Tribal Employment Rights Ordinance. MTO 2002-02.1 (hereafter “TERO”). The original complaint was brought in five counts. Count One alleged a violation of TERO; Count 'Two alleged violations of Connecticut General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. (Unfair Trade Practices Act) and a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
  2. Big Bubba's BBQ, LLC v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2015
  3. Santoro v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API