Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON APPEAL
MANFREDI, J.
HISTORY OF CASE:
This appeal arises out of the dismissal oí the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by the Gaming Disputes Trial Court. The Plaintiff David Bartha is a member of The Mohegan Tribe, and the Plaintiff First American Mechanical, Inc. is a Certified Mohegan Entity as defined in The Mohegan Tribal Employment Rights Ordinance. MTO 2002-02.1 (hereafter “TERO”). The original complaint was brought in five counts. Count One alleged a violation of TERO; Count 'Two alleged violations of Connecticut General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. (Unfair Trade Practices Act) and a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
- Big Bubba's BBQ, LLC v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2015
- Santoro v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2012