Legal Opinion
Bethel v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided December 14, 1998No. GDTC-T-98-105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, Chief Judge.
This is an action in twelve counts, in which the plaintiff seeks money damages and other relief from the defendants, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (MTGA), Mohegan Tribal Gaming Enterprise (MTGE), The Mohegan Tribal Nation (Mohegan Tribe), James K. Keane and Raul Ruiz. The plaintiff claims that he is entitled to recover damages for alleged (1) negligent and intentional tortious conduct of the defendants; (2) violations of the Indian Civil Rights Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1301 et. seq. (ICRA); and (3) violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. All of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2000