Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pineiro v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided October 14, 1999No. GDTC-T-99-102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEagan, J.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The appeal before the court was brought by the plaintiff, Steven Pineiro, pursuant to Ordinance No. 95-6. The defendants have not challenged the authority of this court to adjudicate the matter.

Prior to June 23, 1998, the plaintiff was an employee in the Mohegan Sun Casino. As part of this employment, the plaintiff was duly licensed by the Gaming Commission. His employment at the casino as a dealer depended upon his license. On June 23, 1998, Pineiro was arrested at the Foxwoods Resort Casino along with an employee of Foxwoods, Miguel Rivera, after it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. George Groundhog v. W. W. KeelerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. New England Savings Bank v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. David Joseph Red Fox v. Marcia Annett Red Fox, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, and Irene B. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2000
  2. Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2001
  3. Culley v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
  4. Cherestal v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2002
  5. DeProfio v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API