Legal Opinion

Kwai Fun Wong v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 2004No. 02-35727PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a set of thorny procedural and substantive questions implicating several areas of constitutional and immigration law. These questions include: the scope of some of the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)1; the boundaries of the constitutional protections afforded certain aliens returning from abroad; and the availability of a qualified immunity defense to federal officials facing Religious Freedom Restoration Act…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ellen Keates v. Michael KoileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Jewett v. AndersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Nune Mamouzian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Kwai Fun Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Barajas-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API