Legal Opinion

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 2, 1981No. 78-1789PublishedCited by 484 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The “filed rate doctrine” prohibits a federally regulated seller of natural gas from charging rates higher than those filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to the Natural Gas Act, 52 Stat. 821, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 717 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp. III). The question before us is whether that doctrine forbids a state court to calculate damages in a breach-of-contract action based on an assumption that had a higher rate been filed, the Commission would have approved it.

I

Respondents are producers of natural gas, and petitioner Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. (Arkla) is a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by484 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

479 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API