Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 2007No. SC 88122PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Special Judge.

I. Introduction

This case involves a motion to enforce a settlement agreement in a tort action. The Eatons contested the motion alleging they did not authorize the figure offered by their dismissed attorney that was accepted by the defendants.

The Eatons originally filed suit for property damage to their home allegedly caused by groundwater made toxic by waste discharged by a nuclear fuel processing operation conducted by the defendants. They refused to sign a proffered agreement on the basis that they never authorized the settlement figure and had dismissed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Madison Block Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Leffler v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Buemi v. KerckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. Emerson Electric Co. v. Marsh & McClennan CompaniesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Bath Junkie Branson, L.L.C. v. Bath Junkie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. CARL E. SMITH and MARGARITA SMITH v. GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY, GREGORY HERKERT, and THE STOLAR PARTERSHIP, LLPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Grant v. SearsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API