Legal Opinion

CARL E. SMITH and MARGARITA SMITH v. GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY, GREGORY HERKERT, and THE STOLAR PARTERSHIP, LLP

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2014No. SD32604PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

Carl and Margarita Smith owned motel property subject to a mortgage that Respondents purported to foreclose over the Smiths’ objection. The Smiths sued. The parties’ lawyers quickly explored settlement, reached agreement, and circulated settlement documents which the Smiths refused to sign.

Respondents moved to enforce the settlement. After an evidentiary hearing, the court granted the motion and entered judgment accordingly.

The Smiths appeal, raising three points. We affirm.

Background1

Paul Hasty represented the Smiths at all times; Rod Loomer facilitated negotiations on Respondents’ behalf.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Houston v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. In the Interest of: J.A.R., D.K.R., and A.E.R., Children Under Seventeen Years of Age, Greene County Juvenile Office v. D.G.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pemiscot County Port Authority v. Rail Switching Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Central Parking System of Missouri, LLC v. Tucker Parking Holdings, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In the Adoption of K.M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Warren v. DunlapMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Briggs v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API