Legal Opinion
Leffler v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1981No. 42750PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals following the trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion to compel settlement.
Both plaintiff and defendant are in substantial agreement regarding at least the following facts. Plaintiff filed suit against defendant for damages, and the attorneys for the parties subsequently entered negotiations regarding settlement. Plaintiff was at that time represented by Mr. Green, and defendant by Mr. Bird. Mr. Bird made a settlement offer of $2,000 to Mr. Green. In March of 1979, plaintiff met with Mr. Green and discussed the offer. Thereafter, Mr. Bird received a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wenneker v. FragerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RoussinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Traders National Bank & Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Robinson v. DeWeeseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Sudekum v. Estate of F.S. FasnachtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rosenblum v. Jacks or Better of America West Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Landmark Bank v. First National Bank in MadisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Promotional Consultants, Inc. v. LogsdonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.