Legal Opinion

Buemi v. Kerckhoff

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 2, 2011No. SC 91132PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Arthur Kerckhoff Jr., Arthur Kerckhoff III, Arthur Kerckhoff IV, and the Arthur Kerckhoff Trust (Kerckhoff defendants) appeal the trial court’s order imposing sanctions on them for acting in bad faith in a mediated settlement meeting. Because an order imposing monetary sanctions does not dispose of a “claim for relief’ as required by Rule 74.01(b) and does not satisfy the requirement in section 512.020(5)1 that allows appeals only of final judgments, the trial court certification of its order for immediate appeal is without effect. Accordingly, the appeal is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Douglas Toyota III, Inc. v. KeeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Speck v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Central Trust and Investment Company v. SignalPoint Asset Management, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. First National Bank of Dieterich v. Pointe Royale Property Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Meadowfresh Solutions USA, LLC v. Maple Grove Farms, LLC, Leon Rinehart, Ted Dahlstrom, Carol Dahlstrom, Curtis Hall, Lisa Hall, and Kyle BounousSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API