Legal Opinion

Limpert v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1973No. 130, 131PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Does the insurance policy issued to a father who sponsored his son’s driver’s license include coverage for the father’s imputed negligence and liability resulting from the son’s negligence in operating the son’s own car?

The policy in question provides, on behalf of the named insured, coverage for all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage which arises out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the owned automobile or any nonowned automobile. Gregory’s 1963 Chevrolet is not an owned automobile and is not included as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Chicago Motor Club v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lontkowski v. IgnarskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Leatherman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API