Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1999No. H018530PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*140Opinion

COTTLE, P. J.

I. Introduction

After the probable cause hearing, respondent court dismissed the People’s petition for civil commitment of real party in interest Jerry Howard (hereafter, Howard) as a sexually violent offender under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.).1 The court ruled that due process would be violated if the victim hearsay statements contained in the probation reports were admitted to prove that Howard had committed two or more sexually violent offenses, and that the admissible evidence contained in Howard’s records of prior convictions…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. WoodellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. HubbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Litmon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API