Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hubbart

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2001No. H021322PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

Defendant Christopher Evans Hubbart appeals after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.). The trial court ordered him committed to Atascadero State Hospital (ASH) for a two-year period.

On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the SVPA violates the state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection; (2) the SVPA violates the federal constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws and double jeopardy, and it violates the federal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Seling v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Christopher Evans Hubbart v. Robert Knapp Atascadero State HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API