Legal Opinion
Ruhl v. Town of Fairfield
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 27, 1985No. 3422PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff was injured while walking on Fairfield Beach Road in the town of Fairfield. He brought an action pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-149 against the defendant town of Fairfield for breach of its statutory duty to keep the public highway in repair. The case was referred to an attorney trial referee pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4). After trial, the attorney referee filed a report setting forth his findings and awarding damages to the plaintiff. The trial court rendered judgment accepting the report, from which the defendant appeals.
On this appeal, the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trzcinski v. RicheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Meshberg v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Harbor Construction Corporation v. DV Frione & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Fukelman v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Meder v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Kowalsky Properties, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Blessings Corp. v. Carolton Chronic & Convalescent Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Silitschanu v. GroesbeckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Denby v. Commissioner, Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.