Legal Opinion
Trzcinski v. Richey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 7, 1983No. 10926PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrillo, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision allegedly resulting from the negligent operation of a motor vehi cle by the defendant Janet Richey. The defendants denied their negligence and raised the plaintiff’s contributory negligence as a special defense. The jury returned a general verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the verdict, which the trial court, D. Dorsey, J., denied. Accordingly, judgment was rendered for the defendants, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff presents the following…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Tetro v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gutierrez v. ThorneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.