Legal Opinion

Silitschanu v. Groesbeck

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 11, 1987No. 4484PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The plaintiffs brought suit against the defendant seeking to enjoin him from constructing a commercial building and a septic tank for that building on residential property adjoining the commercial lot. After a trial to an attorney state trial referee, the court rendered judgment for the defendant, denying *58the plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief. From that judgment, the plaintiffs have appealed, claiming (1) that the referee applied an incorrect standard of law to the facts of the case, (2) that he erred in failing to consider testimony of the chief zoning enforcement officer of the city…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Silitschanu v. GroesbeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 786 v. SerraniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Steroco, Inc. v. SzymanskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Baker v. Baker, No. Cv88 0097182 S (May 13, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  5. Bugryn v. City of Bristol, No. Cv98-0488051s (Jan. 31, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API