Utility Cost Management v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Utility Cost Management (UCM) filed a complaint against the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) seeking a refund of sums paid by the Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD) for certain water and wastewater fees. EBMUD filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that UCM’s claim was barred, as a matter of law, by the 120-day statute of limitations contained in Government Code section 66022 1 and by the 120-day statute of limitations in Public Utilities Code section 14402. The trial court agreed and entered judgment in favor of EBMUD. UCM now appeals claiming the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Webb v. City of Riverside, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Regents of University of California v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Regents of University of California v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.