Legal Opinion

Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water District

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2001No. S091117PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case, we decide whether the 120-day statute of limitations set forth in Government Code section 66022 1 applies to an action by a public agency to recover amounts paid to a public utility for capital improvements. We conclude section 66022 does apply, and therefore appellant’s complaint is barred as untimely. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

Utility Cost Management (UCM) is “in the business of reviewing and analyzing utility charges to determine whether there have been overcharges.” UCM, as the assignee of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Varshock v. Department of ForestryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API