Legal Opinion

Stolzer v. Beer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1963No. 40097PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, is a real estate broker. The defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, are a doctor and his wife who formerly owned, and resided at, the residential property, on account of whose sale, plaintiff is attempting, in this action, to recover a broker’s commission from them.

The original contract by which defendants listed the property for sale exclusively with plaintiff, was dated August 25, 1960. In it, plaintiff broker was referred to as “we” and the word “you” referred to the owners of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Dicks v. Clarence L. Boyd Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Shadwick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Pfeiffer v. Peppers Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Leatherman v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krause v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc. v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. Cimarron Exploration Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc. v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Krause v. Dresser IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API