Legal Opinion

Leatherman v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1954No. 34823PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In the trial court Howard S. Freeman, defendant in error here, was plaintiff,, and H. A. Leatherman, plaintiff in error here, was the, defendant. For convenience we shall hereinafter refer to said parties respectively as plaintiff and .defendant, the positions in which they appeared in the trial court.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover $1000 from defendant as a real estate commission, under an. alleged oral -contract whereby he was employed by defendant as the exclusive real estate agent with the exclusive right to sell certain residential property in Oklahoma City owned by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chilton v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Shorten v. MuellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. R. J. Bearings Corp. v. WarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Bowes v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Hammers v. MerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vandever v. GoetteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Coen v. Semgroup Energy Partners G.P., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Stolzer v. BeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Adams & Leonard, Realtors v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API